Please wait...
Please wait...
Latest Searches: Submer , green bulding & Constartion , green , biocoal , cdm , Fabrication Engineers
I heard industry leaders talk passionately about potential for solar to truly bring electricity to rural communities and catalyze grassroots social and economic development. Plenty of discussion circled around industry’s demand for adequate support, recognition of its potential, “leveling the playing field” and inclusion on policy discussions. Overall, the energetic conversaion between industry and government reps was indicative of an evolving sector keen not to miss growth opportunities during a time that many see as the inflection point.
The following observations are not new, but are notable because they were made by industry representatives and collectively signal that India’s solar players “get it.”
1. There are more villages and rural population without electricity or access to quality electricity than government statistics let on. The need is such that the entire “20 GW by 2020″ goal could be met by rural systems and hardly make a dent in demand. We need more aggressive goals.
2. Decentralized solar can more cost effectively make a difference than centralized multi-MW solar power plants because of the grid’s poor quality. Transmission losses are as high as 50-60% in some states where the need for rural power is greatest.
3. Government’s policy framework should recognize the above facts and incentivise rural electrification via decentralized solar deployment accordingly. Today it does not.
The hot button issue of the event clearly was about how central government should support both manufacturing and usage (including rural) of PV and solar thermal. The lively conversation between MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy) representatives and industry leaders bordered on an open negotiation.
The following were the broad themes in this regard.
1. Comparison with conventional energy sources, especially coal: It is wrong to compare solar with coal simply on upfront costs alone. Costs associated with fuel (coal), operation & maintenance, grid losses and cost of grid need to be accounted for. MNRE’s response was mixed. While acknowledging the need to devise “apples to apples” comparison, they maintained solar is costly and that their goal is to reduce costs for the consumer.
2. Consistent support for on-grid & off-grid solar power generation: Given the poor quality of the grid and significant hours in a day when the grid is “down,” government should provide consistent tarriff for solar energy produced & used irrespective of grid connection. MNRE’s reps were amenable to the idea and said this may require a certification mechanism via independent 3rd party entities that are able to verify useful electricity produced from distributed power generation.
3. Support for Indian manufacturers to compete, especially with Chinese manufacturers: Industry reps feel Indian goverment needs to do more to “level the playing field” for them to compete with Chinese companies, which apparently receive free land and very cheap capital from China’s government. MNRE reps gave a sneak peek into November announcements stating that “generous” support is on its way.
4. Anti-dumping / quality laws: As PV prices tumble, manufacturers are feeling the pinch. Some industry reps clearly were enraged by what they called “low quality, low cost” products entering India. MNRE indicated new quality certification programs will help here, but ultimately consumer should remain the decision maker.
Both MNRE directors and SESI officers repeatedly referred to an upcoming MNRE policy/tarrif announcement expected around November 15, 2009. I can’t wait to see its details!
